www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19975.php Hope they dont play him at wembley or again, the changed back line has been working well and doesnt need changing which was proved on monday.

www.therhinos.co.uk/news/19975.php Hope they dont play him at wembley or again, the changed back line has been working well and doesnt need changing which was proved on monday.

And Wilkes gets one match for his on Burrow. I really despair at the judiciary at times. Webb was unlucky, Wilkes was well aware of what he was doing.

yes but wilkes does not play for leeds thats why he only got one match

Webbs history may have preceded him coupled with the fact he was off his feet at the point of impact may have made his suspension worse.

^
this

You really are having a laugh arnt you!

Webb was airborne when he hit Kirmond. Burrow could barley get up to Wilkes neck, they were chalk and cheese and quite frankly it Webb should have gone and if the precedent is now set for putting the shoulder in then players should be sent off based on this Wilkes should also have walked.

People like you absolutely infuriate me.

Whilst i agree Webbs past deserved to be considerd that doesn't justify Wilkes only getting one game even with a squeaky clean record he hit Burrow high and late whilst he was static and once again the judicary are shown to be a bunch of inconsistent pillocks!!

They were both charged with the same offence.

In my mind, they were both as bad as each other but for differnt reasons Webb for jumping and follow through and Wilkes for high and late.

Therefore in my mind they should have got the same ban. IMO Previous convitions should only come in for foul play, biff chickenwings etc rather than these incidents that can often be put down to bad luck or poor execution rather than acctually being dirty.

But it is inconsistency which is the problem, not just from the beaks, but also the referees, because given the new stand on the shoulder charge that we have seen this year they both should have walked

So, Brent Webb not allowed to jump to charge down the kick and Kirmond's motion took him into Webb. Webb has turned away and there was nothing deliberate about the contact.

Unlike Wilkes.

Can see where you're coming from there, but part of me dosent buy the charging down,Webby has always favoured throwing himself at an opponent rather than tackling.

50/50, but if it was an intended shoulder charge. Which only Webb knows 2 games is a bit harsh. I staed elsewhere both should have got one match and I stand by that.

However of the 2 it was the one from Wilkes that seemed more malicious and was certainly less accidental

Disappointing - I was hoping for a ban until the end of the season so there would be no danger of him featuring at first team level again at Leeds.