Thoughts?

i'm very happy about it

I am also very happy about it



Glad the RFL watched the incident and realised Bailey elbowed Radders several times in the head, admittedly Radders may have gone a bit OT but he was punished with a red card (which imo cost us the game), Bailey is one dirty player and deserves all he gets

It does seem strange that the original tribunal saw no provocation and despite "taking into account" Radford's previous good character and guilty plea, then decided to apply the maximum sentence available for the offence.

Just what was taken into account?

I have said on numerous occasions: the sooner we adopt a system similar to the NRL judiciary, the better for all concerned. At the moment it is still a lottery and little different to the old "smoke-filled room"

Bloody RFL, in Hull's pocket as usual.

Seriously, a fair outcome as far as I'm concerned. My guess is that Radford was under the impression he was being punched and reacted accordingly.

Hull kingston rovers will be very scared



he is supposed too be a hard man haha ?? watch out when your on the floor and defensless

If someone elbowed me in the face i would give them a crack not that i'm a violent person, but if some cowardly thugs gonna try a cheap shot on you they deserve all they get.

The Donkey playing this weekend will have no barring on the game cause he's fecking poo



GOOD LUCK HULL KR

We aren't talking about Ben Cockayne here...

No we aren't, we are talking about a SL player who punched a fellow player 4 times while he was on the floor, unable to defend himself, we either condone thuggery on the field or we don't lets just make our minds up.

It wasn't thuggery. It was a bit of biff.

Good to see common sense prevail.

Provoked by Bailey's act of thuggish tactics. Clearly the RFL agree, hence the ban removed.

Now, when we're talking about thugs in this next game, I don't think Lee Radford will be the focus, do you?