Looks like a bad one... seems McGuire's ankle has been broken ankle by what looks like a completely unnecessary"crocodile roll" by Marc Sneyd.

Not the sort of thing we need in our game.

No need to roll it like that at all - don't understand Hull fans crying 'no intent' when he quite clearly makes the decision to roll the leg. He didn't intend to injure him, sure, but there was intention in his actions.

Should have been a straight red, looked deliberate and it's the kind of thing that can end careers. Should be up for the same charge as the guy from Championship One which is what, 12+ games?

Both scumbag attacks that are deserving of severe punishment.

its very clear on the sky footage. completes the tackle then rolls and twists mcguires ankle twice. I think he had fridays CC game in mind. Hulls tactis were to do as much damage as possible today and its worked. Sneyd shouldnt play again this season as its unlikley mcguire will

Quote from Radford last year (on Elima)...

Hull coach Lee Radford said in the post-match press conference: "If he's gone to roll his ankle, that's an act of cowardice

How many matches did Elima get?

So he thought in a split second, that he would deliberately injury McGuire so he would miss the game next week, potentially risk a ban and miss the game himself, don't talk daft.

You think Sneyd deserves a 13 game ban?

If you really think Hull want out with tactics to injury Leeds players on purpose you are really don't understand the game.

My opinion is is was a reckless poor decision and he should get a ban maximum 4 games.

4 or 5 I think. Don't know how much of an injury was caused tho'

it will be a minmum of 10 its was worse than chases. theres no legal manouvre that involves holding rolling an twisting an opponents leg. It wasnt accidnental of reckless it was intended to injure/

at best he was reckless or ambivalent to the risk.

Im not sure there is all that much mitigation we can give to a player doing something dangerous in the course of doing something illegal.

Even your reading of it is that Sneyd was reckless in committing an offence whilst in the process of committing a professional foul.

The RFL have set the precedent now, they have to go with one of 8 (Chase) or 12+ (like the guy in C1) to keep consistency for the first time in a long time.