There is no stands or cover from the elements for the spectators at Toronto's Lamport Stadium does this stadium meet the RFL minimum standards criteria for a professional rugby league ground?

Think we all know the standards will go out the window. London's park standard ground will be passed too. Then again Wakefield have got away with Belle Vue for all this time

Oh some people might get wet.

Stay safe Torontarians.

But three and a quarter sides under cover, hardly a fair comparison to Toronto and London.

In two seasons, there's only been one occasion when it rained at match time. Even then, the rain stopped just before kick-off. (Yes, we have that super power.) It does rain in Toronto in summer but it's not the drizzly English kind of rain. Given that we watch Toronto FC in the snow, I think we know to bring a rain mac if it's going to rain and a coat if it's going to be cold.

Wolfpack have been very clear that we're staying at Lamport. No doubt there will be some improvements, but the stadium is owned by the city of Toronto and so any changes have to be negotiated.

It cold and wrse than that in the summer they might get sunburnt.


Maybe. We should do a collection to buy them all. Umbrellas sun screen and waterproofs.

I cannot wait for the first fans from Wigan etc to go over and complain about rain !1

The question was does the Lamport Stadium meet the required minimum standards criteria issued by the RFL

They're well used to rain at the DW. However, if the pies aren't up to scratch, you WILL get complaints - big time!

I suppose if it a problem in the future there are alternatives available in Toronto not that I think it will be the case it’s the pitch I don’t like with all the different markings it reminds me of school

Is there a requirement to have part covered though? I know there is for seating. Lets be honest, i don't think even the SL chairman who hate Toronto dare try block them on a technicality of the stadium when you look at thr state of some in SL.

Well both Dewsbury and Hunslet were refused entry to Superleague due to stadium issues including capacity and seating etc as well as lack of attributable finance so a precedent has been well set.

Castleford and Wakefield have been constantly threatened with demotion if they don’t deliver a new ground and either London who’s ground looks like something you’d play on at a sports centre 3,000 capacity and Toronto who have barrier less terraces (sorry they ain’t seats), looks like it is only part constructed, a crazily marked pitch, less than 10,000 capacity and nothing behind the goals will get automatically promoted?

Oh I forget RL has a life changing North American TV deal??

Sorry but Fred Carno’s Circus looks more sensible than this and don’t say London will rent a ground when needed or Toronto will play there games in The UK.

All this and one team that can’t play at home for almost a quarter of the season... and they said you can’t replace the Chuckle Brothers

Scroll down the link below which lists of populations of UK towns & cities and you will see how many there are with populations above 50,000 that dont have a professional Rugby League team. worldpopulationreview.com/countr ... on/cities/

Scroll down the link below which lists of populations of UK towns & cities and you will see how many there are with populations above 50,000 that dont have a professional Rugby League team. worldpopulationreview.com/countr ... on/cities/