|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 71 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jun 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Im really hoping hock is back for whoever we play in the semi, he was awsome against saints. also would love gil dudson to play as well, he was epic against catalan
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3441 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Hopefully:
1. Sam Tomkins
2. Josh Charnley
3. Darrell Goulding
4. George Carmont
5. Pat Richards
6. Brett Finch
7. Tommy Leuluai
8. Lee Mossop
9. Matty Smith
10. Eric Lauaki
11. Gareth Hock
12. Harrison Hansen
13. Sean O'Loughlin
14. Gil Dudson
15. Liam Farrell
16. Jeff Lima
17. Ben Flower
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 12006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Hock in the starting line up for Hughes. Hughes on the bench for Flower or Dudson.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 29919 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Tomkins
Charnley Goulding Carmont Richards
Finch Leuluai
Dudson O'Loughlin Mossop
Hansen Hock Farrell
Subs Lauaki Lima Hughes Smith
It's got to be 2 from Lauaki, Flower and Hughes on the bench I think. I wouldn't like to leave Hughes out because he's playing well and can cover 2 positions. I thought Flower was excellent against Catalans and would be unlucky to miss out but if Wane is playing him as a prop it'd be a waste having 3 on the bench.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 12006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote NickyKiss="NickyKiss"Tomkins
Charnley Goulding Carmont Richards
Finch Leuluai
Dudson O'Loughlin Mossop
Hansen Hock Farrell
Subs Lauaki Lima Hughes Smith
It's got to be 2 from Lauaki, Flower and Hughes on the bench I think. I wouldn't like to leave Hughes out because he's playing well and can cover 2 positions. I thought Flower was excellent against Catalans and would be unlucky to miss out but if Wane is playing him as a prop it'd be a waste having 3 on the bench.'"
I think the bench will depend on who we play tbh. If we play Catalans again then I expect he will go big on the bench and take Dudson above Flower. If we play Leeds he may go for mobility which would obv have Flower ahead of Dudson.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17844 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Smith for me is a must start and play 80 mins
We would have beat Saints if he was playing his kicking game is the best in our team
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2797 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Oct 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote king warrior="king warrior"Smith for me is a must start and play 80 mins
We would have beat Saints if he was playing his kicking game is the best in our team'"
Smith's not an 80 min hooker IMO. I thought starting Lockers at 9 and bringing Smith on off the bench worked really well against Catalans.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17844 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote WARRIORCRAIG="WARRIORCRAIG"Smith's not an 80 min hooker IMO. I thought starting Lockers at 9 and bringing Smith on off the bench worked really well against Catalans.'" I agree change Tommy and Smith up each do 20 mins a half both need to do 80 for me it's crucial
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2797 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Oct 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote king warrior="king warrior"I agree change Tommy and Smith up each do 20 mins a half both need to do 80 for me it's crucial'"
I disagree, keeping the Finch and Leuluai HB partnership together for 80 mins is more crucial. I hate it when we spell halfbacks and have to start moving 3 or 4 players around when we make a substitution. Start Lockers at 9, with Farrell at 13 and Smith on the bench, Smith comes on for Farrell and moves to hooker with Lockers going back to loose. That worked really well against Cats and I can't see why we wouldn't do it again.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17844 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote WARRIORCRAIG="WARRIORCRAIG"I disagree, keeping the Finch and Leuluai HB partnership together for 80 mins is more crucial. I hate it when we spell halfbacks and have to start moving 3 or 4 players around when we make a substitution. Start Lockers at 9, with Farrell at 13 and Smith on the bench, Smith comes on for Farrell and moves to hooker with Lockers going back to loose. That worked really well against Cats and I can't see why we wouldn't do it again.'" It didn't though Lockers did an ok job at 9 just like he did at 6 the only reason that position change didn't get stick is cause Catalan was very poor you cant do it against top teams
Tommy,Smith and finch all know the script the only people you are changing is Tommy and Smith leave the subs for the forwards cause if we are in a close game we will need them fresh at all times and not blowing
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1704 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2023 | Dec 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Lockers at 9 to start against Cats was fine as they aint the greatest at putting pressure on the dummy half.....Leeds would be a different story, need a dummy half against them
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2797 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2017 | Oct 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote king warrior="king warrior"It didn't though Lockers did an ok job at 9 just like he did at 6 the only reason that position change didn't get stick is cause Catalan was very poor you cant do it against top teams
Tommy,Smith and finch all know the script the only people you are changing is Tommy and Smith leave the subs for the forwards cause if we are in a close game we will need them fresh at all times and not blowing'"
Wane might go for that, can't see it though. Chopping and changing the halfbacks every 20 mins doesn't work, we lose fluidity. Finch and Tommy are looking somewhere near back to their best playing alongside each other. It's obviously not an ideal situation to have our 1st choice hooker out, but if a combination of Lockers and Smith can cover it and leave our 1st choice half backs together then that's what we should go for. I expect the only change from last week will be Hock in for Hughes.
|
|
|
 |
|