just wondering what the wildcats fans think of his appointment so far, good or bad..... just whilst having conversations with many fc fans, the main judge on agar is that he was completely out his depth at fc and in superleague....devout of ideas and a personality for a start.... in my opinion, for whatever reason he couldnt get results with a team in which he put together and was spending the full cap whilst he was coach was bordering on embarrasing......
thoughts??

He's made a good impact here, seems to determined to develop our youth system futher. Perhaps he thought that the youth at Hull were not good enough or not ready for Super league yet.

i can understand that......yet it was agar who thought it better to buy players well past there best and not give a single kid a chance at fc..........since gentles took over we have a new 7 in danny nicholas. who started on sunday....agar didnt even bother with youth....

Sounds like you have made up your mind, so our opinion is pretty pointless, as is this thread.

no, im wondering why it all went tits up at fc for him, he seems to have a young fresh squad at wakey..wereas at fc, he had players well past there best, inwhich he brought in i might add.........

I'm happy with what i've seen so far, it's a lot better than what we had last year!
Sounds like you are happy too so it's win win!

Probably thought they weren't good enough for super league. And without those players "well best [utheir[/u best" you wouldn't have made it to the play offs. FACT.

Popular thought had Uncle Kath as pulling the strings whilst Agar was in charge.

Without interference, perhaps Agar will flourish (similarly Hull under Gentle).

Too early to say but then again coaches have moved clubs before and been better or worse.Ask Leeds fans what they think of Dougie Laughton and then ask a Widnes fan.Two different tales if that helps you in any way.

Any proof of this? There seems to be a lot of people pulling the strings behind the scenes at Hull FC.